Extension Factory Builder Support the work of The Common Sense Canadian!


Facebook

Follow us on twitter

Upcoming events

MAY
24

05.24.2012 05:00 PM - 07:00 PM
Oil Tankers & Pipelines: Good Business or Impending Disaster?

Blogroll

Progressive Bloggers
 

What has been taking place is the rearrangement of control of bulk electricity production in North America by a private US entity. NERC has the power to enforce its will on producers and looks to have the legal authority to by-pass local utility commissions. It is this development that might be the key to the understanding of why BC Hydro has indulged in its aggressive contracting with Independent Power Producers in BC when domestic demand increases are non-existant.

This is neither a complicated nor a long story – but it’s a tragic vindication for a hell of a lot of people who have been telling the story, ignored at best, more often vilified. Look at page 1 of the story in the Vancouver Sun, May 11 under the heading "HYDRO AWASH IN PRIVATE POWER", where you’ll see that BC Hydro is spilling water over its dams and missing a chance to make a huge profit and is, instead, sustaining a crippling loss all by reason of corrupt bargains it’s been forced to make with private companies.

Read this story from Scott Simpson in the Vancouver Sun, reporting on the glut of cheap hydroelectric power in BC and Washington State due to overflowing reservoirs from a big Spring runoff; despite this, BC Hydro is forced to pay top dollar for private power, unable to avail itself of more affordable alternatives. (May 12, 2012)

After a bumper year for precipitation in the Pacific Northwest, BC Hydro stations around British Columbia are sitting idle while independent power producers run flat out.

There’s so much water available for hydroelectric power that a Washington-Oregon utility, which runs full-time to protect salmon and trout, is paying other utilities to take electricity off its hands.

That means bargain-priced import electricity is available to BC Hydro from the Bonneville Power Authority, but it’s a bittersweet opportunity.

It’s difficult for BC Hydro to tap into the cheap power because of contractual obligations to purchase power from about 75 independent power producers (IPPs). Hydro is forced to buy from IPP operators, including big industrial ones such as Rio Tinto Alcan and Teck Resources, even as its own generation stations wait on standby. For example, at Peace Canyon generating station downstream of W.A.C. Bennett Dam on the Peace River, the primary source of hydroelectricity for all of B.C., the turbines are sitting idle for the first time in a decade.

Prices paid to IPPs vary by season, from an average winter high of $100 to a springtime low of about $60. By contrast, the Bonneville price in recent weeks has averaged less than $20 US.

Overall, according to Hydro’s 2011-12 annual report, IPPs earned $676 million from Hydro in the 12-month period ending March 31 ­— at a price per megawatt of power that was more than twice the cost of imported electricity during the same period of time

The water is pouring in just as warmer spring temperatures push down electricity demand. Data this week from the U.S. Energy Information Agency shows Oregon with 172 per cent of its long-term average precipitation supply, and B.C. with 131 per cent.

Meanwhile, a continuing U.S. economic recession is curtailing industrial power requirements south of the border.

That means there’s no market for B.C. electricity exports to the U.S. Nor do B.C. residents need Hydro to crank up domestic production.

B.C.’s IPP community includes wind, large industrial hydro and gas-fired generation — but most operations are small-scale run of river hydroelectric installations.

The textbook case is the watershed of the Squamish River system.

Hydro is taking a pass on all the water running into its Daisy Lake reservoir near Whistler. Instead of diverting the water from Daisy via pipeline to a BC Hydro generating station on the Squamish, the Crown corporation is allowing the water to flow directly downstream into the Cheakamus River.

Meanwhile, on two other Squamish River tributaries, the Ashlu and the Mamquam, Hydro is paying IPPs to generate power for the British Columbia electricity grid.


Read this story from the Victoria Times-Colonist on more revelations from the BC Auditor General on Hydro's shady accounting practices - this time involving hundreds of thousands in executive bonuses paid on non-existent profits.

"B.C. Hydro executives have taken home hundreds of thousands of dollars in bonuses based on profits the province's auditor general says didn't really exist. Senior Hydro officials have their performance bonuses determined in part by the corporation's ability to turn a profit. But auditor general John Doyle's scathing report on the Crown corporation's finances, released Friday, showed Hydro actually lost money recently, and managed to show a profit only by deferring hundreds of millions of dollars in expenses to the future using debatable accounting methods. Nonetheless, the corporation paid out sizable incentive-plan bonuses to its CEO, vice-presidents and chief financial officer." (Nov. 1, 2011)

Read article: http://www.timescolonist.com/business/Hydro+paid+bonuses+existent+profit/5635771/story.html


This month (October 2011) The Auditor General of British Columbia presented his report to Government titled “BC Hydro: The Effects of Rate-Regulated Accounting”. For most folks this is not be a gripping story they will want to master. That of course is exactly what your Government is counting on. To get everyone’s attention here are in his words the financial dimensions of the issue. "As of March 31, 2011, a net total of $2.2 billion in expenses had been deferred and, by government’s own estimate, the balance is predicted to grow to nearly $5 billion by 2017".

Read this story from the Vancouver Sun on Auditor General John Doyle's new report, which slams BC Hydro's bad accounting practices - which will add enormous upward pressure to Hydro's already skyrocketing power rates.

"Questionable bookkeeping methods by BC Hydro have put ratepayers on the hook for $2.2 billion in public debt — with no apparent plan in place to recover the money, Auditor General John Doyle warned in an audit report on Wednesday. Doyle said that if BC Hydro stays with the practice of deferring large debts rather than paying them back and balancing their books each year, the total debt will swell to $5 billion by 2017.

At $2.2 billion, BC Hydro would need a one-year rate increase of 60 per cent to pay off the debt. At $5 billion, the increase would be 150 per cent." (October 27, 2011)

Read full article: http://www.canada.com/news/Hydro%20bookkeeping%20creates%20billion%20risk%20ratepayers%20auditor%20general%20warns/5619234/story.html?mid=51435



Read this essential op-ed from SFU's Marvin Shaffer in the Vancouver Sun, exposing the real cost to British Columbians of a heavily subsidized liquid natural gas boom on BC North Coast.

"A striking feature of the government's jobs strategy is the number of very electric-intensive projects it entails. The strategy calls for the development of new mines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities, all of which will require very large amounts of electricity.

The first phase of the proposed LNG plant at Kitimat in itself will reportedly consume some 1.5 million megawatt hours of electricity per year, or roughly one-third of the entire output of the proposed Site C dam project.

Media commentators have questioned whether BC Hydro will be able to supply these large new requirements for electricity. Some worry that it will not be able to do so because of the capital spending and other constraints that were recommended in the government's recent review of BC Hydro's rapidly rising costs and rates.

However, the real issue here is not whether BC Hydro can supply the electricity these projects will need. It no doubt could by acquiring or developing new sources of electricity supply. The issue is whether, or at least under what circumstances, it should.

One thing is certain. It will be very bad for BC Hydro and consequently all of its existing customers if it does supply electricity to the new mines and LNG facilities at its standard industrial rate. Under that rate, which averages less than $40 per megawatt hour, the amount BC Hydro would receive would be less than half the costs it would incur for the new sources of supply it would have to acquire." (October 205, 2011)


How about a bit of totally nonsensical speculation of the order of “Hitler is alive and well living in Argentina”. Something utterly absurd...Jimmy Pattison has bought the services of BC Hydro CEO Dave Cobb, for whom he must be paying a pretty penny – I mean this guy’s in the million a year range. What reason is there for this? (NDP leader Adrian Dix got off a good one saying that perhaps Cobb has found a Premier Clark he can work with!) What if Pattison has an eye on BC Hydro? Yes, that’s what I asked – what if Jimmy Pattison, an acquisitor par excellence, buys out the jewel of the BC Crown!

Read this story from the Province on the unexpected resignation of BC Hydro CEO Dave Cobb to work for Pattison Group.

"B.C. Hydro president Dave Cobb is stepping down after just over a year in the job, in the latest example of the troubled relationship between the government and the Crown corporation. In an interview Wednesday, Cobb said it was a difficult choice to leave after just 17 months, but he has a 'oncein-a-lifetime' opportunity to work directly with Jim Pattison in senior management of the Jim Pattison Group. Cobb said he will stay at B.C. Hydro until Nov. 30 to help with the organization's transition to an interim CEO." (Oct. 20, 2011)


Bids from IPP’s to supply electricity to BC Hydro recently came in at an average of $100 per megawatt hour for non-firm and $124 for firm. Recent spot market prices ranged from a low of $4.34 for non-firm to a high of $52.43 for firm. Firm power with delivery in 2012 was recently listed at $27-35 on the Pacific Northwest wholesale market...Buying high and selling low doesn’t work for long. So who will pick up the shortfall between what Hydro is paying and what it can sell the electricity for? Well, that would be you, BC Hydro customers.

Page 1 of 3

Latest Video

Vancouver Council Takes On Kinder Morgan Pipeline, Tanker Expansion

More videos...