Support the work of The Common Sense Canadian!


Facebook

Follow us on twitter

Upcoming events

Blogroll

Progressive Bloggers
 

Mad as Hell About Bogus Hydro Rate Increases

Written by Rafe Mair Tuesday, 07 December 2010 03:01
  • font size decrease font size decrease font size increase font size increase font size
  • Print
  • Email
  • 10 comments

It must be a good line because this is the third time in a week I've used H.L. Mencken's great line “Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." After reading the news item that BC Hydro is asking to raise its rates by 27% for upgrading their facilities, then reading the next day it was 55% for “badly needed projects” I found myself once more reaching for my trusty cutlass.  

Is there no end to what we’re asked to believe? John Horgan, NDP Energy critic, was bang-on when he linked this to the outrageous $50 BILLION that BC Hydro owes Independent Power Producers (IPPs) for dams that destroy our rivers and send power not to BC Hydro but to the United States. Would that the NDP deals with private power in stark, unadorned English instead of the sloppy diarrhea that oozes from its program as laid down a few days ago by their now soon to be former leader. 

How dumb do they think we are? Are we to believe that there’s a magic energy fairy at the bottom of the garden who will give Hydro that $50 Billion and rising? This is close to, if not there, plain fraud.  

The plain fact is that every householder not courting bankruptcy knows that you cannot hide a massive debt that is going to build IPPs on our dime, then soak Hydro (meaning us, folks) to the heavens when it's forced to buy private power that they don’t need. 

I want to say this succinctly and in plain English. Our BC Hydro, one of the best energy companies in the world, has no need of more energy yet is forced to buy power from IPPs that they don’t need - meaning they either sell it on the market for ½ or less of what they pay for it or use it instead of their own power at 12 times their own cost of making it

 All together, now, let’s read that paragraph again and march to our nearest antique shop for cutlasses. 

One would think – at least an outsider not au fait with BC politics might – that some politician would take up the cudgels on our behalf! (By the way, if you’re sensitive to bloodshed, buy a cudgel rather than a cutlass). Here we have a Liberal leadership with half a dozen or more candidates and not a word will be uttered about the following: IPPs, farmed salmon, destruction of agricultural land, oil pipelines and tankers filled with Tar Sands sludge. Not a peep will you hear! Not a word even in defence because none of them has the guts to even defend Liberal policies much less oppose them. 

In the unlikely event that the NDPs recover enough to be in the hunt in the next election, where the hell is their courage? 

I’ll tell you where. The NDP's now soon-to-depart leader, Carole James, has been reaching out to the business community, as if that has a chance, and doesn’t want to unduly worry the captains of industry who look upon the environmental disgraces given us by Pinocchio Campbell & company as great steps forward. 

Ms has James talked about the IPP fixes in terms of “sanctity of contract." These deals are more like those of a hoodlum mayor of a city who hands out plush contracts to his brother-in-law – they would make “Boss Tweed” of New York, “Boss Prendergast” of Kansas City, or Chicago’s Richard Daleys, pere et fils, blush with pride yet the NDP position is “sanctity of contract!" 

What are the options we’re left with? 

One is to join one of the major parties and try to make them change their policy. That should be a remedy but, alas, it won’t work. Political parties are run by the few at the top and all resolutions they don’t like are either not brought forward for debate or are so watered down as to be pre-digested mush. 

Another would be to support the Greens, something I would do in a flash if I thought they could even win a seat but they can’t and won’t. The Greens, decent honourable people who want to save and protect the environment often get anger with me at public meetings when I say this but have no answer when I point out that after 25 years they haven’t elected a soul, indeed haven’t even been close. (At a recent speech I gave in Courtenay, a “Green” lady went to the floor mic, obviously annoyed at what I had said, and said this:- the reason the Green Party hasn’t elected anybody is that they don’t get enough votes!” God’s truth! 

You could encourage and join a third “middle-of-the-road"

Party if one comes forward. The logical people to make this happen are Chris Delaney and/or Gordon Wilson. Delaney already has a party, BC First, and if meat can be put on those bones it becomes a rational option.

There is something, however, we all can do and indeed must do – raise Hell; such Hell that whoever runs for office will know that the electorate is white hot with anger. We must show all politicians that we will take action no matter where the latest environmental abuse occurs - action even including civil disobedience. We must do this even if it isn’t the particular “outrage” that grabs us most.

Damien and I have started to tour the province and starting next February we will bring our presentation, including videos, a local voice, and my own.

Let me close with this: you can always get rid of a bad government and restore the economy with another.

What you can’t do is get the environment back – once lost it stays lost.

If you haven’t started to fight yet, now’s a very good time to start. If you have started, it’s a great time to intensify the fight and encourage others to do the same.

We have a long way to go and the bad guys have all the money. Yet, if we all do decide with sharpened cutlasses to get into the fight and stay with it, we can and will beat the bastards and leave a legacy for future generations.


Last modified on Tuesday, 07 December 2010 03:40
Rafe Mair

Rafe Mair

Rafe Mair was a B.C. MLA 1975 to 1981, Minister of Environment from late 1978 through 1979. Since 1981 he has been a radio talk show host, and is recognized as one of B.C.'s pre-eminent journalists.

Website: rafeonline.com/

10 comments

  • Sunday, 02 January 2011 21:04 posted by Sustainable

    What a load of hogwash by Rafe Mair. As usual no sources to his rants.

    BC Hydro has said that the total value of ALL contracts, even those with its subsidiary such as Columbia Power, and with Fortis, Alcan, Teck, and wind, and biomass, and gas generation in Taylor, and cogen, etc. etc. is only $ 17 billion. Only a 1/3 of that is for 20 run-of-river contracts, and then half of the run of rivers will never get built because they have salmon in the streams.

    So about $5 billion over 40 years goes to run of river where BC Hydro receives green, sustainable, and clean power for a very low price (some at 5 cents a kWh), and where the price of such power in California is tremendous - for a huge profit to BC Hydro.

    Rage's $50 B and "loss" is counter-factual, made up, and with no citation either.

    A bigot against clean energy and self-sufficiency and putting BC ahead should not even be trying to comment on BC Hydro. Rafe wants BC Hydro to buy coal fired dirty power from the Americans to enrich them at the expense of BC.

    1
    1
    Report Abuse

  • Monday, 13 December 2010 18:10 posted by Norm

    Now we know why Campbell was invited to the globalist Bilderberg meeting in May which took place in Spain. He want to enrich himself at BC's expense. I wouldn't be surprised if someone in Bilderberg got his charges in Hawaii dropped in 2003. He should be investigated for BC Rail, BC Hydro, Vancouver Convention Ctr. These make the fast ferries look like pocket change. Of course let's not forget the fraudulent science of gloabal warming. (The carbon tax). Even David Jones the head of the climate research university said the "climategate" eamils are true and that the world as a whole is cooling. I used to believe in AGW, but after doing research it's proven fraudulant. I still believe in caring for the environment.

    1
    1
    Report Abuse

  • Sunday, 12 December 2010 09:30 posted by Eileen Spencer

    Yes we should be angry! Why are so many BC residents apparently disengaged from these issues? Why are so few of us seeking the truth?
    This and many other injustices cry out for our involvement and yet the apathy is still there. The anti-HST movement aroused interest but was it only because the pocket book was attacked? Have all our values been reduced to money?
    If BC will wake up and recognize that our fundamental rights as citizens are gradually disappearing I believe that we have one last chance to turn things around. You are right, Rafe, THE BC FIRST PARTY is a good vehicle for this. My hope is that the people of BC will wake up to the fact that we will soon become serfs again and take the reins of democracy. BC First offers us a rare opportunity to break away from the control of big business and labour - or any self interest group, and to have an individual impact on the running of our great province. Let's take back BC people! Sign up for BC First today.

    1
    1
    Report Abuse

  • Saturday, 11 December 2010 13:09 posted by Vox.Pop

    Campbell & the Liberal government should be indicted for malfeasance - abuse of public office: these are criminals who should be given long prison sentences as a message to all the other greedy people who want to feed at the tax-payer trough.

    2
    2
    Report Abuse

  • Friday, 10 December 2010 06:44 posted by steve

    it was nice to read this article and all the comments from nolidgable people,thanks.it helps me a little to understand why after spending thousands of dollars this year upgrading the lighting in our condominium why our hydro bill went up more than 20% SHOCKINGLY when we were told it would go down about 12% !

    4
    2
    Report Abuse

  • Thursday, 09 December 2010 12:53 posted by S.Davis

    John Horgan for leader and premier! No wonder the msm has come out against replacing Ms. James! Keep fighting and working for change everybody!

    7
    1
    Report Abuse

  • Thursday, 09 December 2010 09:05 posted by Gary Toole

    Thank you Sir, i always appreciate your passion, I think the people of British Columbia are starting to wake up!!! lets hope... Run of river projects were always a joke as existing Dams have there surplus of energy the same time these smaller ones do...... imagine that spring run off...... let see what kind of an application for rate increases they submitt this year
    thanks again To Arms Im going to dust mine off

    8
    1
    Report Abuse

  • Wednesday, 08 December 2010 15:51 posted by Adam Frey

    Raif, you'll soon notice these IPP's that no one has heard of as there are something like 11 proposed in the Chilliwack River Valley alone on various creeks that feed the river. Below is a link to a slightly outdated (as in many more are now completed and/or proposed) map of the BC IPP's.

    http://www.ippwatch.info/w/

    The Ashlu River near Squamish is the best example of the destruction that can be caused to these rivers.

    http://www.ashlu.info/

    This is a level of fraud akin to what Enron was in California, unfortunately the people in power are currently perpetuating it and until people start to care or do something, nothing will change. That is why we need to do all we can.

    9
    0
    Report Abuse

  • Wednesday, 08 December 2010 15:28 posted by James

    Hey Raif,

    This whole rate increase thing is something that is not being talked about enough, or being considered with enough clarity. I would think that rate increases of this magnitude would get people up-in-arms as soon as its mentioned. Perhaps it's just from my isolated perspective here in the Columbia Valley, but I have not even heard this matter discussed in public.

    The larger point though, is that rate increases can be very useful for curtailing demand, which is a good thing taken on the whole. The problem is, how can the public swallow massive rate increases if the perception is that the increase is going strait to the IPP industry. If the rate increases were implimented purely for the sake of reducing energy consumption, and the revenues could be put to some sort of good cause that would be ideal. As it stands however, you make a really point about breaking out the cutlasses.

    I don't want to subsidize the IPP industry through my energy bill. It's like paying someone to go and destroy the river in my backyard that I enjoy playing on. I can't believe some dumb economists thought up this idea. They should fired!

    11
    0
    Report Abuse

  • Tuesday, 07 December 2010 13:05 posted by Rick

    Hey Raif, as the law of British Columbia is the British law as it stood on November 19, 1858 could we not enter int Lawful Rebellion under Article 61 of the Magna Carta http://www.tpuc.org/node/285

    9
    0
    Report Abuse

Comments are closed